![]() So it does seem like the issue is specific to pixel shifted composites.Īdobe says they support the raw files from the camera, but is that support fully realized yet? Or is there simply something I'm doing wrong that is not allowing the file to be read properly? I can also export from Olympus Workspace after doing some editing, and get a JPEG that is sharper even than the one produced by the camera during the process.Īlso, using the Live ND mode in the camera doesn't seem to create an issue, and Olympus is still creating a composited ORF file when in that mode, but when opened in Lightroom those files have plenty of detail and seem totally fine. The files are actually much less sharp than a normal 20mp shot from the camera, and a normal ORF seems to open fine with plenty of detail. ![]() ![]() No amount of sharpening, etc will fix them in Lightroom. Not only is the jpeg created by the camera much sharper, but the ORF files, when opened in Olympus Workspace, are much sharper than when opened in Lightroom. After trying many different settings, and many different shots, and also opening files in Luminar and Olympus Workspace, along with comparing the files with the jpeg created by the camera during the high resolution shot process (cam creates a composited ORF file, a single image ORI file, and a composited JPEG file), it seems as though Lightroom is the issue. I have noticed there seems to be an issue with LR processing the high res raw files from the camera.īasically, the shots look unsharp. I use Lightroom for almost all of my editing. I recently purchased an E-M1 III, and love the camera. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |